Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

    Hurtigruten ASA moves headquarters from Narvik to Tromsø in 2013.
    Many employees (up to 60 people) will lose their work space in Narvik.
    Best wishes from
    Bengt Domben

    Comment


      Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

      And put every building or office space they own out for sale.
      Plan is to rent whatever space they need in the future.

      Obviously a new broom in place....
      "IF GOD COULD MAKE ANGELS...., WHY IN HELL MAKE MAN?"

      Comment


        Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

        Narvik always seemed like an odd choice.

        Surely, there must be advantages in having the headquarters in one of the ports that is actually on the route.
        ---------------------------
        Harald Jarl, Honningsvag to Svolvaer, Summer 1985.
        Deck plan geek.

        Comment


          Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

          Sorry. Double-post.........
          Last edited by HurtigruteMartin; December 16th, 2012, 13:25. Reason: Double-post

          Comment


            Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

            http://www.hurtigruten.no/Global/Ima...eplan_2013.pdf


            In the new 2013 sailing list, there is a strange change compare to 2012.

            "Due to rule-change, the car-capacity will be redused to max 20 car pr ship"
            (not FM, TF anf MS)

            Can anyone please explain to me WHY.......and what kind of RULE this is ????
            Last edited by HurtigruteMartin; December 16th, 2012, 13:27.

            Comment


              Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

              Originally posted by HurtigruteMartin View Post
              http://www.hurtigruten.no/Global/Ima...eplan_2013.pdf

              In the new 2013 sailing list, there is a strange change compare to 2012.

              "Due to rule-change, the car-capacity will be redused to max 20 car pr ship" (not FM, TF anf MS)

              Can anyone please explain to me WHY.......and what kind of RULE this is ????
              My first thought was the size of the "open spaces" and the divisions / water tight doors that are used to make them smaller.... But, honestly, I have no idea actually.
              With best regards from Jan-Olav Storli

              Administrator and Owner of CaptainsVoyage.
              Main page: http://www.captainsvoyage.com
              Old forum: http://captainsvoyage.7.forumer.com/
              Join us: Save the "Kong Olav" on facebook

              Surround yourself with positive, ethical people who are committed to excellence.

              Comment


                Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                Hurtigruten didn't make money on the Aussie adventure after all??
                This from smp.no today: http://www.smp.no/nyheter/article6851561.ece

                Never mind that the picture accompanying the article about Finnmarken is of Trollfjord, the Boskalis dredging and construction workers are described as "oljearbeidere" and the that the Gorgon Gas Field is called "oljefelt". Checking facts is not a requirement for posting articles on smp.no

                Comment


                  Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                  [QUOTE=ombugge;100699]Hurtigruten didn't make money on the Aussie adventure after all??
                  This from smp.no today: http://www.smp.no/nyheter/article6851561.ece

                  Det som er saken er vel at de ikke mottok de siste 99 av 697 millioner?

                  Comment


                    Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                    Originally posted by Skipskatta View Post
                    Det som er saken er vel at de ikke mottok de siste 99 av 697 millioner?
                    Why didn't they get the last payment... was there any kind of mis-agreement between the charterer and Hurtigruten?
                    With best regards from Jan-Olav Storli

                    Administrator and Owner of CaptainsVoyage.
                    Main page: http://www.captainsvoyage.com
                    Old forum: http://captainsvoyage.7.forumer.com/
                    Join us: Save the "Kong Olav" on facebook

                    Surround yourself with positive, ethical people who are committed to excellence.

                    Comment


                      Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                      Hurtigruten struggling to "stay afloat":

                      http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/nordland/1.9687388
                      With best regards from Jan-Olav Storli

                      Administrator and Owner of CaptainsVoyage.
                      Main page: http://www.captainsvoyage.com
                      Old forum: http://captainsvoyage.7.forumer.com/
                      Join us: Save the "Kong Olav" on facebook

                      Surround yourself with positive, ethical people who are committed to excellence.

                      Comment


                        Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                        Hurtigruten news on smp.no today: http://www.smp.no/nyheter/article6857767.ece
                        Some CVF members who know this gentleman???

                        Comment


                          Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                          Originally posted by pakarang View Post
                          Why didn't they get the last payment... was there any kind of mis-agreement between the charterer and Hurtigruten?
                          (I keep forgetting to keep it in English here...) I think the reason that they didn't get the last 99 millions, was a disagreement concerning the barge that Finnmarken was staying at in Australia. This barge supposedly became much more expensive than foreseen.

                          Comment


                            Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                            Originally posted by Skipskatta View Post
                            (I keep forgetting to keep it in English here...) I think the reason that they didn't get the last 99 millions, was a disagreement concerning the barge that Finnmarken was staying at in Australia. This barge supposedly became much more expensive than foreseen.
                            There was a Barge used as a "landing platform" moored alongside her Stbd. side for the duration. This should have been a very well known expense as there isn't anything other than the day rate involved. (No crew and no fuel cost)

                            The Supply vessel that was also a part of the deal would have been a more likely source of unforseen expenses, but that should not involve payment from the Charterers as it was part of the deal originally made between HRG and Boskalis. (Any "miscalculation" of expenses would be for HRG's account)

                            I have not found anything to explain this dispute.

                            Comment


                              Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                              Originally posted by ombugge View Post
                              There was a Barge used as a "landing platform" moored alongside her Stbd. side for the duration.
                              On some occasion this barge also made a hole in Finnmarken's hull. The vessel returned to harbor for a short period of time to do repairs. Could this have something to do with the disagreement?

                              Comment


                                Re: Hurtigruten ASA - news and comments

                                Originally posted by Tommi View Post
                                On some occasion this barge also made a hole in Finnmarken's hull. The vessel returned to harbor for a short period of time to do repairs. Could this have something to do with the disagreement?
                                She was in Dampier for a few days. Hardly likely to cause dispute in the region of NOK 99 mill.
                                Any "downtime" NOT caused by Cyclones during the charter period should also have been deducted on a monthly basic, not after conclusion of the Charter.
                                As far as I know the vessel was not "off-hire" for any length of time, once installed in the moorings at Barrow Island.
                                Most likely the dispute is over the extensive cost when the vessel was mobilized and de-mobilized, incl. the waiting time in Freemantle and the long stay at Sembawang Shipyard in Singapore, unless the mob/de-mob was based on a lump sum each way.
                                Last edited by ombugge; December 28th, 2012, 18:28.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X